Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to muffafa.com

Muffafa | Personal Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
83match
albertilagan.dev
Albert | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
thayrov.com
Thayrov | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
abhishek-kumar.net
Abhishek | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
msulemvn.com
Muhammad | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
aaronmotacek.dev
Aaron | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
ange.dev
marquez.ANGEL | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
4dmediatv.com
Argir Popov | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andrewsanc.dev
Andrew Sanchez | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
justinminaya.com
Justin Jr | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
justinjrminaya.com
Justin Jr | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
justinjrdev.com
Justin Jr | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
abdullahshzd01.com
Abdullah Shahzad - Personal portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
abrishtech.com
Abraham W Personal portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
alexdametto.dev
Alex Dametto | Personal Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
tevidma.com
Goran Stefanovski - Tevidma | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
aamish.net
Personal Portfolio - Aamish.net
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
annd.dev
Ananda Satria's Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
sipitca.com
Constantin - Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.