Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to mud-made.com

Lauren Dorman → Design & Cultural Technologist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
anaskamel.com
Anas Kamel — Creative Technologist
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
madebyfieldwork.com
Fieldwork — A Design and Technology Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
abdulq.com
Abdul Qureshi — Creative Technologist & Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
digitic.com
fastboil | design technology
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
ismailseleit.com
Ismail Seleit - Senior Architect & Design Technologist
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
shanxiherecasa.com
Shanxi Here Casa Technology
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
aaadaaam.com
Adam Stoddard - generalist designer & creative technologist
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
angelicaortizcreates.com
Angelica Ortiz - Creative Lead | Experiential Design & Creative Technology
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
mohamedsuhail.com
Mo - Creative Technologist
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
digitechpunch.com
Digi Tech Punch — Digital Design & Technology Services
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
heregiam.com
Where technology meets design - aumlette
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
kooricontacts.com
Abodigital Calibre – Blending culture, creativity with technology
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
morebymore.com
MORE Studio, creative practice working between design and technology
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
nvtechnologiesllc.com
NV Technologies
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
shannonecke.com
Brand design & motion graphics - Shannon Ecke Design
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
abbassbeity.com
Abbas Sbeity — Designer, Curator & Cultural Producer
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
ito-design.com
ITO Design | Design & Development
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
shapratechnologies.com
Shapra Technologies
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.