Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mthanasi.com

Majorka Thanasi · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
justindeanfoster.com
Justin Foster
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
mufeezamjad.com
Mufeez Amjad
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
lorenzinigiovanni.com
Giovanni Lorenzini
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
andrewting.dev
andrew ting
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
aedev.net
AE Dev – AI, Mobile & Software Engineering
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
musegimicael.com
Muse Gimicael
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
sinurat.com
Owen T Sinurat
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
bstefanski.com
Bart Stefanski — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
ashwathkrishnan.com
Ashwath Krishnan's Website
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
pablonz.com
AI Software Engineer | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
jubinsoni.com
Jubin Soni - Portfolio & Blog
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
rehanmohideen.com
Rehan's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
atkinsondev.com
Craig Atkinson
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
juliavalenti.com
Home | Julia Valenti
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
alexscott.io
Alex Scott
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
coryking.com
Cory King
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
pabloencalada.com
Pablo Andrés Encalada — Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
abhishekingle.dev
Abhishek Ingle
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.