Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mtalev.com

Mark Tamer Alev | Here is the full story · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
63match
alexandre-therrien-it.dev
Alexandre Therrien's Portfolio Website
2 shared topicscareers
63match
msulman.com
Sulman | Senior Full-Stack Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
63match
aaron-burke.me
Aaron Burke - Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
62match
lucasmichaeldahl.com
Lucas Dahl — Principal Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
62match
brunomachadors.com
Bruno Machado | QA Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicscareers
62match
justhyre.com
Justhyre - Hire the Best WordPress Developers
2 shared topicscareers
62match
akshaykarki.tech
Akshay Karki - Software Engineer Portfolio | Akshay Karki
2 shared topicscareers
62match
burtelov.dev
Vadim Burtelov — QA Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
62match
efazati.com
Mohammad Efazati - Principal DevOps Engineer & Co-Founder of EasyEnv
2 shared topicscareers
62match
andrii-lysenko.dev
Andrii Lysenko — Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
62match
msaeed.dev
Mohamed Saeed
2 shared topicscareers
62match
andrewkim.tech
Andrew Kim
2 shared topicscareers
62match
adrianromo.me
Adrian Romo — Senior Backend Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
61match
lucasmoes.com
Lucas Moes | Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
61match
builtbyvictor.dev
Victor Nunes — Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
61match
bymalik.dev
Malik - DevOps Engineer | SRE | Cloud Architect
2 shared topicscareers
61match
lpaldano.com
Lyall Paldano — Senior QA Automation Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
61match
aaser.net
Doug Aaser
2 shared topicscareers

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.