Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to msuddon.com

Mark Suddon · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
corneliachow.com
Cornelia Chow – Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
abigeorge.com
Abi Geroge
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
acatl.dev
Acatl Pacheco — Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
annapapitto.com
Anna Papitto – Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
bayosodimu.com
Bayo Sodimu
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
heithecker.dev
Clemens Heithecker
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
heithecker.com
Clemens Heithecker
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
heliocorreia.com
Home | Hélio Correia
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
isobel-taylor-joyce.com
Isobel Taylor-Joyce
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
sharif-hossain.com
Md Sharif Hossain
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
itsbenweeks.com
Ben Weeks – Software Engineer in the Boston Area
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
knziee.dev
Knziee - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
domneill.com
Dom Neill
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
bayer.dev
Matthias Bayer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
mohamadalmoussa.com
Mohamad Almoussa - Resume
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
aarishlakhani.com
Aarish Lakhani
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
bayete.com
Bayete Inc.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
calindoran.com
calindoran.com // software engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.