Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to msparker.com

M. S. Parker Books · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
judenbooks.com
Juden Books
2 shared topicsromance
67match
brynneweaverbooks.com
Romance Author | Brynne Weaver Books
2 shared topicsromance
65match
lottiemathews.com
Lottie Mathews
2 shared topicsromance
65match
tgpartainbooks.com
T. G. Partain
2 shared topicsromance
65match
atkumagai.com
a.t.kumagai – Fantasy Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
65match
rebeccadeelbooks.com
Rebecca Deel Books
2 shared topicsromance
65match
lorrainepearl.com
Lorraine Pearl
2 shared topicsromance
65match
reginaruddmerrick.com
Regina Rudd Merrick - Inspirational Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
64match
julianadorney.com
Author of The Dragon's Curse | Fantasy Romance Book | Julian Adorney
2 shared topicsromance
64match
rebeccamain.com
Rebecca Main — Paranormal Romance Author — Follow the Magic – A Darker Shade of Paranormal Magic
2 shared topicsromance
64match
tessa-kane.com
Tessa Kane – MM Paranormal Romance
2 shared topicsromance
64match
acgreenlee.com
A.C. Greenlee
2 shared topicsromance
64match
loreleibrogan.com
Western Romance Author Lorelei Brogan - Homepage
2 shared topicsromance
63match
paige-addams.com
paigeaddams | Paranormal Romance
2 shared topicsromance
63match
pamelaaares.com
Pamela Aares – USA Today Bestselling Author of Contemporary Romance, Romantic Suspense and Women's Fiction
2 shared topicsromance
63match
reginapaul.com
Regina Paul Author
2 shared topicsromance
63match
andrewgreybooks.com
Home - Andrew Grey
2 shared topicsromance
63match
brucealanwalker.com
Time travel novel | Bruce Walker Price of Time
2 shared topicsromance

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.