Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mshumway.com

Michael Shumway - Historian and Educator · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
mrbrasher.com
Michael R. Brasher, Author and Historian
1 shared topicshistory
71match
louishyman.com
Louis Hyman | Historian and Author
1 shared topicshistory
69match
historyeducate.com
History Educate
1 shared topicshistory
69match
rebeccaerbelding.com
Holocaust Historian and Author | Rebecca Erbelding
1 shared topicshistory
69match
adamwoodhistory.com
Adam Wood: Crime and Policing Historian
1 shared topicshistory
69match
thbaughman.com
T.H. Baughman, Ph. D – Historian and Traveler
1 shared topicshistory
68match
historianinharness.com
Historian in Harness
1 shared topicshistory
68match
eframserashriar.com
Historian | Efram Sera-Shriar
1 shared topicshistory
68match
historicalpoint.com
Historical Point - Historical Point
1 shared topicshistory
68match
rebekkahrubin.com
Rebekkah Rubin – Public Historian and Historical Consultant
1 shared topicshistory
68match
labhistorical.co.uk 🇬🇧
Laura Aitken-Burt | Historian & Archaeologist
1 shared topicshistory
68match
historianjoshua.com
Historian Joshua
1 shared topicshistory
68match
cambridgehistorian.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cambridge Historian
1 shared topicshistory
68match
burnidge.net
Cara Burnidge – Historian of American religion and politics
1 shared topicshistory
68match
historianscommunism.com
Historians Communism
1 shared topicshistory
68match
andrewdormanhistory.com
Andrew Dorman – Personal site of historian Andrew Dorman
1 shared topicshistory
67match
andrewsperling.com
Andrew Sperling, PhD – Historian
1 shared topicshistory
67match
historicalfiles.com
Home - Historical Files
1 shared topicshistory

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.