Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to msabt.com

Move Slow & Build Things | Substack · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
100founders.ai
100 Founders | Substack
1 shared topicsstartups
72match
hmelius.com
Moving Bangladesh | Elius | Substack
1 shared topicsstartups
71match
rebelspeakeasy.com
Rebel Speakeasy | Substack
1 shared topicsstartups
70match
lonelybluepixel.com
Lonely Blue Pixel | Sam | Substack
1 shared topicsstartups
70match
theangle.com
The Angle | Darrell Etherington | Substack
1 shared topicsstartups
69match
loomingventures.com
Looming Ventures | Pablo Pinto | Substack
1 shared topicsstartups
69match
signalsofscale.com
Signals of Scale ⚡ | Naman Narula | Substack
1 shared topicsstartups
69match
africanaccelerationism.com
African Accelerationism | Kyle Schutter | Substack
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
buildingstacklist.com
Building Stacklist
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
lorouniverse.com
Loro Universe — Building Things That Matter
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
buildsomethingwonderful.com
Build Something Wonderful
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
build-mob.com
Build Mob - Where Mobility Founders Build the Future
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
mrinalanand.com
Mrinal Anand — Entrepreneur, Builder, Thinker
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
buildinchaos.com
Build in Chaos | Build in Chaos
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
buildthedoor.com
Build The Door | Startup Idea Discovery Platform
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
buildxconsult.com
Home | BuildX
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
builderpeers.com
BUILDERpeers | Home
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
buildtrail.app
BuildTrail — Track Your Startup Journey & Build in Public
1 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.