Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mrohbeck.com

Martin Rohbeck · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
luapmartin.com
Paul MARTIN
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
mtakac.com
Martin Takac - personal page
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
thchar.com
Theo Charalambous
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
funaiclass.com
Martin's Fun AI Class
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
aaronroy.net
Aaron Roy
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
lucabertinetto.com
Luca Bertinetto
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
justinramsaran.com
Justin Ramsaran
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
efe-cinar.com
Hamit Efe Çınar
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
juandiego-rodriguez.com
Juan Diego Rodriguez | The University of Texas at Austin
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
mpreziosi.com
Marco Preziosi - Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Web
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
simplismartemails.com
Simplismart
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
simplismartemail.com
Simplismart
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
lucascogrossi.com
Lucas Cogrossi
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
atinna.ai
Martina — AI Operations Hub
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
lorainefranke.com
Loraine Franke
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
panditaman.com
Pandit Aman | Digital Artisan & Research Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
andrewking.org
Andrew King – Creative Artificial Intelligence
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
andrewking.io
Andrew King – Creative Artificial Intelligence
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.