Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mrobson92.com

Matthew Robson – Experimental and Welfare Economist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
simonsiegenthaler.com
Simon Siegenthaler | Economics and Experiments
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
juliaerose.com
Julia Elisabeth Rose – Associate Professor | Behavioral and Experimental Economics/Finance
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
futureeconomists.com
Future Economists
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
moustafamaher.com
Moustafa Maher – Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
fscheifele.com
Fabian Scheifele – Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
economicsfaq.com
EconomicsFAQ – Explaining economics and defending the free market
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
louissears.com
Louis Sears – Natural Resource Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
acwatt.net
Aaron C Watt – Energy, Resource, & Environmental Economics PhD
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
honesteconomist.com
The Honest Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
the-care-economy.com
Tim Jackson | The Care Economy
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
economistup.com
Economist Up
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
economistasia.com
Save 50% | Subscribe to The Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
palestinedatastore.com
Institute for Social and Economic Progress
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
theamateurnetwork.com
The Amateur Economists
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
economistapobre.com
Home | Economista Pobre
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
aboutphiliphbrown.net
Philip H Brown Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
pabloherreroecon.com
Pablo Herrero | Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
ecomunnics.com
Ecomunnics – Economics Made Simple
1 shared topicseconomy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.