Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mrjeffreyb.com

Mr. Jeffrey B · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
jrnold.com
Jeffrey Arnold
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
theailifestrategist.com
Dr. Jeffrey L. Edwards | The AI Life Strategist
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
byrne.ai
Jeffrey Byrne | Privacy-First Visual AI
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
thedataquarry.com
Home • The Data Quarry
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
andreygizdov.com
Andrey Gizdov
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
jsnover.com
Jeffrey Snover's blog | Inquiring mind opines…
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
mrprompty.com
Mr. Prompty - Give Me a Task.
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
buildmeasurelearn.com
Accentient
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
aitastetest.net
AI Taste Test
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
asksync.ai
Ask SYNC (RC1-Domain) (TIG)
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
sixsides.ai
Sixsides
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
augustov.dev
Augusto Valbuena — Engineer, Builder, Tinkerer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
theartitechhub.net
Artitechhub
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
atreydesai.com
Atrey Desai
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
fromaitech.com
FromAITech
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
textfigaro.com
TextFigaro — Your AI, one text away
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
thepromptpalhq.com
The Ultimate AI Prompt Handbook | The Prompt Pal
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
buildmymind.app
Cognito Vault
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.