Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mrjacklu.com

Jack Lu · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
packlabz.com
Pack Labz
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
mpereira.dev
Murilo Pereira
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
murilopereira.com
Murilo Pereira
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
sierrajackson.com
Jackson Sierra
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
reijn.dev
Niels Reijn
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
5tigerjelly.com
My name is Chris
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
luisdrodriguez.com
Luis Rodriguez
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
buraksen.dev
Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
musadiqpeerzada.com
Musadiq Peerzada
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
aubreyhaskett.com
Aubrey Haskett
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
buck-labs.com
Buck Labs | Build. Break. Learn. Repeat.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
paircoders.com
Pair Coders – Thoughts and words about software technologies
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
luckypines.com
Fumiaki Yoshimatsu
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
brunocesar.com
Bruno Ribeiro | Software Engineer & Consultant
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
burakozer.com
Burak Özer (brkzr) | burakozer.com
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
alejandropch.com
Alejandro Pachas
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
alexsh.me
Alex Hollander - Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
a16n.dev
Alex Nicholson
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.