Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mrigankiraj.com

Mriganki Raj | UX Designer, Researcher & Architect · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
rebeccafavorito.com
Rebecca Favorito | UX designer, researcher, and leader
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
buildwithmatt.com
Matt Pine | UX Designer + Architect
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
ashlyncassity.com
Ashlyn Cassity | Senior UX Designer & Researcher
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
mynameismonica.com
Monica Alexander — UX Designer · Systems & Architecture
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
mrahmadusama.com
Ahmad Usama | UX Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
hksinc.com
HKS | Architects & Designers
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
pamelaohaeri.com
Pamela Ohaeri — Product Designer & UX Researcher
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
ozanyetkin.com
Ozan Yetkin - Researcher | Developer | Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
signalarch.com
SIGNAL | Architecture + Research
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
juliayaodesign.com
Jyue-An (Julia) Yao — UX Researcher & Experience Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
pablomunozunceta.com
Pablo Muñoz Unceta – Architect specialized in urban research and design
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
paigesaez.com
Paige Sáez – Product Engineer, Researcher, Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
attardoarchitecture.com
Attardo Architecture & Design
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
mpnandpartners.com
MPN + PARTNERS | Architecture & Design
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
rhpartnership.co.uk 🇬🇧
Architects & Designers | rhp
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
anotherandywong.com
Andy Wong — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
buplusdesign.com
Home | Bu+// architecture and design
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
juangie.com
Juan Gie - Architectural Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.