Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mpzalewski.com

Mateusz Zalewski - Software Architect & Trainer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
junlongk.com
Jun Long - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
byrd.digital
Kylan Byrd - Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
alanvnorcott.com
Alan Norcott - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
abey.dev
Abey Thomas - Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
hoera.dev
Samuel Höra - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
alexischavez.io
Alexis Chávez - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
justincomino.com
Justin Comino - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
andrewflanery.dev
Andrew Flanery - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
lsphillips.com
Luke S. Phillips - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
adev.me
ash · software engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
jurnalanas.com
Jurnal Anas - Software developer, builder, and amateur writer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
thealanmartinez.com
Alan Martinez - Software Engineer - Chicago
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
muratciftci.com
Murat Ciftci – Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
burhanuddinhamzabhai.dev
Burhanuddin Mulla Hamzabhai - Software Engineer | Author
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
juniormayhe.com
Junior Mayhé - Software Engineer 🧑‍💻
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
mtucholski.com
Michael Tucholski- Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
palladion.com
Palladion Software
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
abhyuday.dev
Abhyuday | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.