Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mpierce.io

Mark Pierce · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
sillycodeproject.com
Silly Code Projects - a place to put the code thoughts
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bugkrusha.com
Bug Krusha
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
lpaneque.com
Paneque's Technology Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
lowkeycode.com
Low-key Code
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
alexyoung.org
Alex Young
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
silentbyte.com
SilentByte
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
agilecoder.org
AgileCoder.net
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
justinaiken.com
Justin Aiken - Thoughts on Coding and Stuff
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
fuabioo.com
Fabio Mora
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
the-coding-lab.com
The Coding Lab
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
ashton-w.net
Ashton-W
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
createdbypete.com
Peter Rhoades | Thought, stories and ideas.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
siraben.dev
siraben’s musings | Writing proofs and programs.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
ashtonmoore.dev
Ashton Moore
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
loungecoder.com
Homepage - lounge coder
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
bryanlor.com
Bryan Lor - A place to scribble down everything tech and code from Bryan Lor.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
alaminopu.me
Al Amin's Playground - Sharing my thoughts, ideas, experience, and imagination
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
anitalakhadze.dev
Ani Talakhadze
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.