similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to mphilipose.com

Manuel Philipose · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

Emmanuel "Manny" Aguero

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

acsmallhorn.com

Adam Smallhorn – Security Engineer - Sydney, Australia.

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Emmanuel Pina — IT & Cybersecurity

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

lucaschristian.com

Lucas Christian – Security Engineer

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Julián Gómez · Offensive security engineer

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

andrewjhill.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

holoolagoke.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

abnerpallichan.com

Abner Pallichan | Security Systems Engineer

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Andrew Bortz's Minimal Home

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

redapproach.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Bailey Masters | Cybersecurity Engineer

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

0xeb_bp | a security blog

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.