Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mpharrigan.com

Matthew Harrigan · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
hmjackson.com
Matthew Jackson
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
mtmatthews.com
Michael Matthews
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
palkimas.com
Matthew Palkimas | Senior SDE at AWS
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
mplappert.com
Matthias Plappert
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
mplappert.io
Matthias Plappert
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
creativemachinas.com
Creative Machinas | Justin Matthews | Substack
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
cadrel.dev
Cadrel
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
andrewhabib.org
Andrew Habib - Home Page
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
furrig.com
FurRig AI
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
ada-dao.org
Ada DAO LLC
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
louiseharms.com
Louise Harms
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
simonpopham.com
Simon Popham
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
mulligan.dev
Ryan Mulligan
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
silasgarrido.com
Silas Garrido
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
abidoon.com
Voice AI Harness
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
simachew.com
Simachew Mengiste
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
mr-riganti.com
Mr. RIGANTI - Advanced AI Coding Agent in Azure DevOps
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
mrriganti.com
Mr. RIGANTI - Advanced AI Coding Agent in Azure DevOps
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.