Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mpfau.com

Mike Pfau · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
ivopfaffen.com
Ivo Pfaffen
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
diiploy.ai
Diiploy
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
swaza.ai
SwazaAI
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
maikeosborne.com
Maike Osborne
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
mohammedfarish.com
Mohammed Farish
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
ganajayant.dev
Gana Jayant Sigadam
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
mohamedbc.com
Mohamed Bencheikh - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
digiwraith.com
Digi | Christian Roubideaux
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
lyricodes.com
LyriCodes | Full-Stack Developer & AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
concertogame.com
Glen Rhodes - Game Developer, Technical Director, Composer and Author
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
hectorarriola.com
Héctor Arriola
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
itsamoghgr.com
Amogh's Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
shervinazadi.com
Shervin Azadi | Home
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
annabelgoldman.com
Annabel Goldman
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
supaleon.com
Leon Liu
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
suryathota.com
Surya Thota - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
0arr.com
Zero ARR Labs
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
shirkoohi.com
Kavia Shirkoohi
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.