Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mpalmes.com

Michael Palmes - Personal Portfolio Website · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
alexdametto.dev
Alex Dametto | Personal Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
thakkarravi.com
Web Master Ravi – Personal Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
aaronmotacek.dev
Aaron | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
ai-hybridwheels.com
ai-hybridwheels.com – Personal Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
abdullahshzd01.com
Abdullah Shahzad - Personal portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
aamish.net
Personal Portfolio - Aamish.net
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
sipitca.com
Constantin - Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
justinminaya.com
Justin Jr | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
justinjrminaya.com
Justin Jr | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
justinjrdev.com
Justin Jr | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
thayrov.com
Thayrov | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
bulutyerli.com
Bulut Yerli Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
albertilagan.dev
Albert | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
muffafa.com
Muffafa | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
msulemvn.com
Muhammad | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
byronsargeant.com
Byron Sargeant - Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
attilanagy.dev
Attila Nagy | Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
abrishtech.com
Abraham W Personal portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.