Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mouradev.com

Lucas Moura · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
lucasginard.com
LucasGinard
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
lucasarden.com
Lucas Arden's Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
lucasayb.com
Lucas Yamamoto | Software Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
lucasyamamoto.com
Lucas Yamamoto | Software Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
lucasgallen.com
Lucas: Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
thanoskolonis.com
Thanos Kolonis
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
loucascubeddu.com
Loucas Cubeddu - Computer Science and Statistics Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
tescari.dev
Luca Tescari — Full-stack developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
61match
adama.dev
adama’s blog 🤯 | This is an awesome description!
3 shared topicsweb-development
61match
acbarnett.dev
All posts | Code and Math
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
andrich.me
Someone Who Codes
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
atharfaridi.com
Athar Faridi
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
createfaillearn.com
Create.Fail.Learn
3 shared topicsweb-development
61match
byanr.com
Home of Byanr - Byanr
3 shared topicsweb-development
61match
lubien.dev
Lubien · Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
61match
richwerden.com
Rich Werden
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
burgstaller.dev
Rainer Burgstallers Blog
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
astlaure.com
Alexandre St-Laurent
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.