Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to monito.dev

Your AI QA engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
ishanrathi.com
Ishan Rathi | AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
dingjames.com
James Ding – AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
kononov.ai
Gonzo Engineering
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
lvv-hub.com
Le Van Viet | AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
sharonmk.com
Sharon — AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
jackmonte.com
Jack Monte — AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
dingusagar.com
Dingu Sagar — AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
dolenko.com
DOLENKO — AI Engineering
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
etanheyman.com
Etan Heyman — AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
macauive.dev
Iver Macaulay - AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
monjardino.dev
Jaime | AI Engineer & Developer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
sharmadevesh.com
Devesh Sharma - AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
sharmavarun.com
Varun Sharma — AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
0xfauzi.com
Fauzi - AI Software Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
anfloy.com
Anfloy - Your AI Engineering Team for Agentic Systems
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
hezekai.com
Zekai He | AI Agent Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
ivaliev.dev
Ismail Valiev — AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
mohithkanala.com
Mohith Kanala, AI / ML Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.