Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to modsefa.com

Modsefa · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
heyeduardo.com
Eduardo Rocha | Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
commonswear.com
CommonsWare
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
commonsware.com
CommonsWare
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
objectionable-c.com
Objectionable-C | Objectionable-C
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
3xion.dev
Nolan Stone
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
jasonhowlin.com
Jason Howlin
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
jasperdunn.com
Jasper Dunn
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
nvkhuy.com
nvkhuy
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ivaliullin.com
Welcome to Ilsur's blog! | Ilsur Valiullin
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
helabenkhalfallah.com
Code, Craft & Community - Sharing my journey in software development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
higherorderlogic.com
Higher Order Logic | Concerning software development and other topics.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
olivetor.com
Opinions
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
jadekneen.com
Jade Kneen – Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
anuchito.com
All posts | AnuchitO Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
israelcruz.dev
Israel Cruz - blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
obedmacallums.com
Obed Macallums
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
pixcoders.com
Rafal Spacjer blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
sharpnado.com
Sharpnado
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.