Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to moderndukes.com

Adam Jones · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
montepjones.com
Monte Jones
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
rhiannonjones.com
Rhiannon Jones
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
montasaurus.com
Adam Montgomery
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
ofonesandzeros.com
Of Ones and Zeros
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
lifeintech.co.uk 🇬🇧
LifeinTECH | Technology and Development
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
nuvizus.com
STAYUX - Product Designer & Architect
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
anojans.com
Anojan Sivaranjan
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
meda.co.uk 🇬🇧
Martin Adams
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
dipeshkc.com
Dipesh KC
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
helloravi.com
Ravikanth Andhavarapu
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
camstrobel.com
Cam Strobel: Product Design Leader
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
databuzz.co.uk 🇬🇧
Databuzz - Embedded System Design & Video Compression Products
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
anthonymineo.com
Anthony Mineo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
cameroncabo.com
Cameron Cabo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
exyte.com
Mobile App Development | Exyte
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
kr-data.com
Your Data Talks
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
obakelabs.io
Obake Labs
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
observekit.com
Easy data logging for research and development projects | ObserveKit
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.