similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to ml-personaltraining.com

Ml Personaltraining alternatives & similar sites

Marco Lindt ML-Personaltraining 74343 Sachsenheim — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Fitness And Exercise →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
hazzan-coaching.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Hazzan Coaching - Personaltraining vom Mediziner und Sportler %	Germany de	fitness-and-exercise WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vic-tori.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Tori Hoffmann \| Yoga, Pilates und Personal Training München	Germany de	fitness-and-exercise WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
constantin-eisenlohr-personaltraining.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Online-Coaching & Personaltraining \| Constantin Eisenlohr	Germany de	fitness-and-exercise	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
vfit-training.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	PERSONAL TRAINING	Germany de	fitness-and-exercise Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ballerinafit.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	BallerinaFit \| Personal Training	de	fitness-and-exercise Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
treboder.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Fitnesskurse und Personal Training in Dresden - Fit Together	de	fitness-and-exercise	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
christina-personaltraining.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Christina-Personaltraining - Home	Germany de	fitness-and-exercise	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dh-fitness.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Dirk Hohnen Personal Training Fitness & Gesundheit	Germany de	fitness-and-exercise WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
va-personaltraining.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	VA Personal Training	Germany de	fitness-and-exercise WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drenpa.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	DRENPA - Personaltraining, Outdoor, Liechtenstein	de	fitness-and-exercise WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cl-personal-training.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	cl-personal-training - HOME	Germany de	fitness-and-exercise	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
owens-training-mallorca.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	home - Personal Training Mallorca	Spain~ de	fitness-and-exercise WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ckpersonal.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	CK Personal Training	Germany de	fitness-and-exercise	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cw-personaltraining.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Personal Training Düsseldorf - Neuss \| Christoph Winkelmann	Germany de	fitness-and-exercise WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hillary-coley-fitness.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Hillary Coley - Pilates & Personal Training in Schwabing München	de	fitness-and-exercise Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
coach-mitch.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Personal Training und Fitnesstraining - Coach Mitch	Germany de	fitness-and-exercise WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
christinkaschube.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Christin Kaschube Personaltraining	de	fitness-and-exercise WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trainingsdeck.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Trainingsdeck – Personal Training in Hamburg	Germany de	fitness-and-exercise	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.