Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to miroco.com

Home · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
39match
gut-einern.de 🇩🇪
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
32match
marekdeniziak.com
Home
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
31match
formstudioschewior.de 🇩🇪
Home
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
31match
prodesstudio.de 🇩🇪
Home
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
29match
cerdip.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
29match
didaxon.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
29match
goldmann-metallbau.de 🇩🇪
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
29match
undeaco.de 🇩🇪
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
29match
elisabeth-richter.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
28match
genitalegal.de 🇩🇪
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
28match
metalpower.de 🇩🇪
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
28match
eliotheodor.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryfine-art
28match
freetech.de 🇩🇪
Projekte – freetech GmbH
0 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
27match
afi-studio.com
Home - MB
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
25match
dianetics-finn.com
HOME
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
25match
felsensteinproject.com
HOME
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
25match
gloatz-hille.de 🇩🇪
Home
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
25match
gestalterei-internet.de 🇩🇪
Home
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.