similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to miniprofiler.com

Miniprofiler alternatives & similar sites

MiniProfiler: A simple but effective mini-profiler for .NET and Ruby — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
detective6.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Detective 6	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doodlepad.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	DoodlePad - A Simple Event-Driven Graphics Library for Java	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
developingthedeveloper.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Developing the developer - Write clean code and keep it simple.	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
detassigny.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	$> blog detassigny.net \| Simple Blog	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1ma.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Write it simple - Simple programming short articles. Mostly ruby focused.	en	programming-languages	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotnetcodr.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Exercises in .NET with Andras Nemes \| Tips and tricks in C# .NET	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotlang.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	dotLang \| A minimal but powerful programming language based on C, Go and Haskell	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robertoisboring.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Mindful Development \| A Space for Reflection, Code, and Creativity	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baboonmedia.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	BaboonSoftware.com - Intelligent and Creative Programming	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baboonsoftware.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	BaboonSoftware.com - Intelligent and Creative Programming	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5minsofcode.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	5 minutes of code	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aeruder.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	tldr; aeruder \| Blog for Andrew Ruder. I like Kansas City, linux, perl, ruby, emacs, and lots of other stuff.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
streamui.app ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	StreamUI — Reactive Stream Visualizer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotnetcoretutorials.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	.NET Core Tutorials	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
technoninjas.co.uk ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Techno Ninjas – We run coding clubs on a Saturday (term-time) and half-term holiday clubs playing the popular game Minecraft	United Kingdom en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
helloworld.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Hello World - Simple source code examples	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotnetlogging.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	.NET Logging Tools and Libraries \| dotnetlogging.net	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotnet-guide.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Your Practical Guide to .NET - dotnet-guide.com	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.