similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to mindslabpub.com

Mindslabpub alternatives & similar sites

Medical Publishers - Home - Mind's Lab Publishing — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Publishing Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
pagebloompublishers.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Book Publishing Agency \| Page Bloom Publishers	US~ en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
heritagepublishinginc.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Home - Heritage Publishing, Inc.	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chembiopublishers.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Chembio Publishers - Right Choice for Researchers	US~ en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
365bookpublishers.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Expert Book Publishing Services \| 365 Book Publishers	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
idifyconsulting.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	IDIFY PUBLISHING - Home	en	publishing-industry Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mindandbodyworld.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Self Publish Your Book on Amazon Kindle - Mind and Body World Publishing	en	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
yudu.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Digital Publishing Software Platform \| YUDU Publisher	en	publishing-industry HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
360bookpublishers.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Looking for Book Publishing services? \| 360 Book Publishers	US~ en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
clearspringsglobal.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	iPublisher - Digital Publishing Platform for Interactive Content Creation	UK~ en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doowapublishers.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Doowa Publishers \| Independent Publisher	en	publishing-industry Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
advantacore-sp.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Home - Advantacore For Scientiﬁc Publishing	en	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cypruspublishersassociation.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Home - Cyprus Publishers Association	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acascipub.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Academic and Scientific Publishing	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hiddenlegacypublishers.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Hidden Legacy Publishers \| Leading African Book Publishing Company	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
affinitygrouppublishing.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Home Page \| Affinity Group Publishing	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
citylightpublishers.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Global Self-Publishing Made Easy \| Top Online Book Publishers	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
abiolapublishing.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Abiola Publishing Limited - Home	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tridevpublishers.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Tridev Publishers \| Book Publishing Company in India \| Tridev Publishers	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.