similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to mindarmor.ai

Mindarmor alternatives & similar sites

MindArmor - Make Humans Defensible — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
aiarmor.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	AgentArmor — Defense-in-depth for AI agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
airisknavigator.app ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	AI Risk Navigator — Every AI risk decision, scored and defensible	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
detect-fakes.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Liveness Detection (PAD) & Deepfake Defense \| BioID	Germany~ en	artificial-intelligence WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tronlabs.ai ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Protectron — AI-Native Digital Forensics	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
strain-database.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Verifying you're human	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 4
acessio.ai ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Agent-based defensibility platform — SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentcred.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	AgentCred - Trust the Human Behind the Agent	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
troofai.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	TroofAI — Deepfake Defense, Powered by Hardware	Canada~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oxbowkit.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Open Bias — Make your agents follow rules	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rowanstack.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Open Bias — Make your agents follow rules	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agent-sec.tech ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Agent-Sec \| Autonomous Offensive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
truaud.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Truaud \| Defending Against Deepfake Threats	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clawcheck.io ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	ClawCheck - Human-in-the-Loop Permission Broker for AI Agents	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baitshield.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	BaitShield: AI Call Concierge & Scambaiting Defense	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
actoriss.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	ACTORISS - NHI-first Identity Governance for Humans, Machines & AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
custodianconsulting.co.uk ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Custodian Consulting — Offensive Security. Defensive Confidence.	United Kingdom en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
1defender.ai ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	1Defender Platform — One AI. Every cloud. Every defense.	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fronesislabs.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	DCL Evaluator — Make AI decisions cryptographically auditable · Fronesis Labs	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.