similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to mind-gard.com

Mind Gard alternatives & similar sites

Mindgard - Automated AI Red Teaming & Security Testing — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mindgard.ai ↗	100 match 2 shared topics	Mindgard - Automated AI Red Teaming & Security Testing	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xclaw.dev ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Local AI pentesting for security teams	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 7
360sec.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	AI-Powered Cybersecurity Services — MDR, Red Teaming & AI Security Testing \| 360 Security Group	US~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cytix.io ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Cytix - AI-Powered Security Testing Platform	GB~ en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mindfizz.ai ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	MindFizz — AI Security & Automation	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bairdaugustineibank.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	APIsec: AI-Powered Continuous API Security Testing	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
bairdaugustineib.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	APIsec: AI-Powered Continuous API Security Testing	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
bairdaugustinebank.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	APIsec: AI-Powered Continuous API Security Testing	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bairdaugustineteam.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	APIsec: AI-Powered Continuous API Security Testing	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
0eroshot.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	ZeroShot — Offensive Security Testing for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
mitigatesecurity.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	MitiAI \| Mitigate Security — AI-Powered Security Testing Platform	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eaglesfield.ai ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Eaglesfield Adversarial AI \| LLM Security & AI Safety Testing	GB~ en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
strix-dev.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Strix - Autonomous Security for the AI Era	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
strix-sec.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Strix - Autonomous Security for the AI Era	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trampolyneai.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	AI Red-Teaming & Runtime Security Platform \| Trampolyne AI	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
domitek.ai ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Domitek MAISP: Managed AI Security Provider	US~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
straightupbase.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	AI Audit & Security Experts \| Straight Up Base	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laibyrinth.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Laibyrinth - Enterprise AI Training & Security \| ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.