Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to mightyseek.com

Dan On Dev – Hacking Software Engineering Leadership · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
100match
hackdevleadership.com
Dan On Dev – Hacking Software Engineering Leadership
5 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
100match
hacktechleadership.com
Dan On Dev – Hacking Software Engineering Leadership
5 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
93match
danondev.com
Dan On Dev – Hacking Software Engineering Leadership
4 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
55match
cusdev.com
CusDev – Custom Developed Software
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
54match
d-e-g.com
Design Engineering Group
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
53match
byteswithcoffee.com
Home - Bytes with Coffee
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
52match
adozioxx.com
adoziox com – My adoziox com Blog
5 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
52match
itriedbeingnormal.com
I Tried Being Normal – A blog about computer science.
5 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
52match
iamjasonhoward.com
Jason Howard – Digital Creator
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
50match
loveontech.com
Love On Tech – Reviews, Guides, Tips
3 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
50match
metadesko.com
MetaDesko
5 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
50match
cybertalk247.com
www.cybertalk247.com -
5 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.