Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to midnightsea.com

Nathan K Johnson Design Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
themidnightsea.com
Nathan K Johnson Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
boangelov.com
Game Design Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
kryptekdev.com
Kryptek Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
7samperry.com
Sam Perry - Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
matthulse.com
Matt Hulse | Level Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
benstoddard.com
Ben Stoddard - Level Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
grusso94.com
Giacomo Russo | Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
mateuszfigura.com
Mateusz Figura | Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
arianalawdesign.com
Ariana Law Design | Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
andrewmclamb.com
Projects | Andrew McLamb: Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
a-sobolev.net
My Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
newtarch.com
My Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
newtonw.com
William Garner Newton – Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
connoradamson.com
Connor Adamson Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
mattiaspersson.com
Mattias Persson Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
rondaveyart.com
Ron Davey Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
mateuszmotylinski.com
Mateusz Motylinski - Game Programming & Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
coatsoup.dev
Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.