Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to michaelmuzzie.com

Michael Muzzie · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
mcastiglia.com
Michael Castglia
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
kwyjibo.com
michael.wendell
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
matthewmichaeldavis.com
Matthew Michael Davis
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
67match
2eease.com
2Eease – Michael Thue
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
themichaelkell.com
Home - Michael Kell - Web Design
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
rmorel.com
Richard Morel
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
rmnet.com
reel media `'
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
dmuszynski.com
Daniel Muszyński – Digital Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
newangelmedia.com
New Angel Media
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
integetni.com
Graham Richardson
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
rlomotey.com
Raphael's Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
adamrichards.me
Home | Adam Richards
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
bnlmultimedia.com
B&L Multimedia Co. Ltd.
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
pixelmousestudios.com
HOME - Pixel Mouse Studios
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
61match
pixelmm.com
Portfolio - Pixel MultimediaPixel Multimedia | Multimedia Design/Development
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
61match
rjvalencia.com
Richard (RJ) Valencia - Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
61match
dmitev.com
Daniel Mitev's Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
61match
krmaquinart.com
PlumberX || Responsive HTML Template
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.