Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to michaelbtager.com

Michael B. Tager | Baltimore-based Writer and Editor · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
hellagoing.com
Dina Klarisse – Freelance Writer and Editor
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
anitaoliviakoester.com
Poet And Writer | Anita Olivia Koester
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
euriglenn.com
Euri Glenn | Writer, Poet, Editor
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
andivandenberge.com
A. VDB – Writer | Reader
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
garyjansen.com
Gary Jansen - AWARD-WINNING AUTHOR, SPEAKER, AND EDITOR
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
andrealuttrell.com
Freelance Writer | Andrea Luttrell writer
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
andimyles.com
Andi Myles | Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
korareydgar.com
Kora Reydgar - Someone trying to live and write
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
anitanahal.com
Writer | Anita Nahal
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
eshleighton.com
Writer | ESH Leighton
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
sheawinters.com
Shea Winters – A poet, writer, and aspiring publisher
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
andreaspofford.com
Andrea Spofford – Writer & Editor
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
andreaskevington.com
Andrea Skevington | Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
65match
garrisonbenson.com
Garrison Benson: writer and podcaster
2 shared topicspoetry
65match
nuraine.com
Nuraine Sadaf – Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
65match
composetales.com
Compose Tales – Write, Read and Smile
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
caitlinstobie.com
Writer | Caitlin Stobie
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
dinahryan.com
Dinah Ryan | writer
2 shared topicspoetry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.