Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to michael-eggar.com

Michael Eggar · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
kwyjibo.com
michael.wendell
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
matthewmichaeldavis.com
Matthew Michael Davis
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
67match
2eease.com
2Eease – Michael Thue
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
67match
kydecker.com
Ky Decker · Ky Decker
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
67match
aidanparker.io
AIDAN PARKER
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
themichaelkell.com
Home - Michael Kell - Web Design
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
kyler-ux.com
Kyler Nguyen - UX Designer in OKC
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
benjaminjohn.com
Benjamin John
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
alexanderclarke.me
Matter - Alexander Clarke
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
roneilla.com
Roneilla Bumanlag - Interaction Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
kyletstone.com
K Thomas Design | UX Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
arnavchand.com
Arnav Chand - Product Designer & Front-End Developer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
ipatarro.dev
Ismael Patarro — Junior Frontend Developer & 3D Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
adriennegrace.net
Adrienne Grace - Visual Designer | Front-end Developer | Certified Accessibility Professional
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
360setup.com
Tom Kraetschmer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
alexistoledo.dev
Alexis Toledo - Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
ashmw.dev
AshMW
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
ashmw.net
AshMW
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.