Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mgroup.at

M-Group | Home · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
koese-group.com
KÖSE Group - Home
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
72match
koesegroup.com
KÖSE Group - Home
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
67match
conrenland.com
Home | CONREN Land
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
67match
bb-estates.com
BB Estates Group | We make a difference
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
67match
baurat.com
baurat hagemann gmbh | Home
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
66match
zech-project.de 🇩🇪
Home: ZECH GROUP
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
66match
lzh-group.com
LZH Group – Nachhaltig Wert schaffen
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
66match
world-investment-group.de 🇩🇪
Home | World Investment Group
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
66match
bss-group.at 🇦🇹
BSS Group
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
65match
poetterrealty.com
Poetter Realty - Home
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
65match
der-baudoktor.at 🇦🇹
Home
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
65match
heico-property-partners.com
Immobilien - HEICO Group
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
65match
richertgroup.com
Immobilieninvestment | Richert Group
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
65match
heico-motorsport.com
Startseite - HEICO Group
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
65match
heicomotorsport.com
Startseite - HEICO Group
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
65match
objektleiter.com
Startseite - HEICO Group
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
65match
objektleitung.com
Startseite - HEICO Group
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry
65match
support-for-realestate.com
Home | SUPPORT FOR REAL ESTATE
1 shared topicsreal-estate-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.