similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to menketraining.com

Menketraining alternatives & similar sites

Menke Training – Training, Beratung, Coaching — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Vocational Training →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ctb-online.org ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	CTB - Training, Coaching und Beratung	de	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stageacademy.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Stage Academy München - Coaching, Training, Beratung	de	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doppelklick.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Doppelklick – Training und Beratung	de	vocational-training Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baric-training.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Baric Training \| Beratung \| Coaching - Startseite	Germany de	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
berlinrealities.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Berlin Realities – Training, Coaching, Kommunikation, Design	Germany de	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
amtraining.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	AM Training - amtraining	Germany de	vocational-training Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mediatorenwerkstatt.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Mediatorenwerkstatt – Mediation, Coaching, Training	de	vocational-training WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beraten-und-gekauft.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Holger Waldminghaus – Coaching und Training zu Kundenberatung, Führung und Vertrieb	Germany de	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heikerehm.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Home - HEIKE REHM COACHING & TRAINING	de	vocational-training WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dawidjan.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Training und Beratung Dawidjan UG	de	vocational-training Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agiletesters.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	ISTQB Training, Software Testing & Agile Beratung \| trendig	Germany de	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
alea-training.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	alea – training – Verstärke dein Team	Germany de	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aleatraining.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	alea – training – Verstärke dein Team	Germany de	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ac-testtraining.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	AC-Testtraining – News	Germany de	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beyond-training.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Nicole Hinds – Ihre Expertin für Training und Coaching	Germany de	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bettertrainings.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Diversity Trainings \| Better Trainings	Germany de	vocational-training WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
better-trainings.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Diversity Trainings \| Better Trainings	Germany de	vocational-training WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
erfolgsfaktor.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Seminare Kommunikation, Coaching Führungskräfte, Beratung	de	vocational-training WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.