Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to meganphi.com

Megan Phi / Product Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
sarahidemoto.com
Sarah Idemoto / Product Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
77match
karljsolano.com
KJS - Product Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
75match
nilomizavery.com
Product Designer (UI/UX)
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
75match
ianwongdesign.com
Ian Wong | Product Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
75match
ryodesigns.com
Ryo Ogawa - Product Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
75match
ngulak.com
Nik Gulak - Product Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
akinadesign.com
Richard Akina, Product Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
ninavanell.com
Nina Vanell | Product Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
katiabohbot.com
Katia Bohbot I Product Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
aelamir.com
Ammar ElAmir - Product Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
nuynaaron.com
Aaron Nguyen — Product Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
ghadaelhady.com
GHADA A.ELHADY Sr. Product Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
aaronvale.com
Product Designer | Aaron Vale
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
idamadam.com
Idam Adam - Lead Product Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
aguscruiz.com
Agustín Ruiz — Product Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
73match
kennethchombahdesign.com
Kenneth Chombah | Product Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
73match
ddavilav.com
David Davila - Product Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
73match
nicholastasato.com
Nicholas Tasato – Product Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.