Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to meetjohn.com

John Christensen - Senior Product Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
swatiparmar.com
Swati Parmar — Senior Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
75match
annagrynko.com
Anna Grynko — Senior Product Designer · Systems & AI
2 shared topicsdesign
75match
anjlinair.com
Anjli Nair — Senior Product Designer and Researcher
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
angelalinzm.com
Angela Lin · Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
gaoqianjun.com
Gao Qianjun — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
andryta.com
Andrea Valerio | Senior Product Designer | AI-Enhanced UX Specialist
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
ishantandel.com
Ishan Tandel | Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
annamulamba.com
Anna Mulamba | Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
garethchainey.com
Gareth Chainey | Product Designer × AI
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
hellokarthi.com
Karthikeyan Muralidharan - Product Design Leader
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
ishmaelmccalla.com
Ishmael McCalla. AI-native product designer and builder.
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
officialjp.com
Joey Primiani · AI Product Design Leader
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
helzeidy.com
Helzeidy - Digital Creative Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
molliewren.com
Mollie — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
itsdavidstone.com
David Stone | Impact + AI Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
anandmoon.com
Anand Moon | AI Product Designer for SaaS & Design Systems
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
camhaag.com
Camilla Haag — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
rickgeniso.com
Rick Geniso - Product Design + Strategy
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.