Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to meesters.dev

Forgejo: Beyond coding. We Forge. · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
arkaiagame.com
Forgejo: Beyond coding. We Forge.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
100match
sollamoose.dev
Forgejo: Beyond coding. We Forge.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
82match
alexmakarevich.net
Sign in - Forgejo: Eh
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
82match
8bitbuddhism.com
Forgejo: Dionysus
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
81match
cloudreviews.com
Forgejo
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
81match
fastcourier.com
Forgejo
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
81match
grimstack.dev
Forgejo
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
2ncs.dev
2ncs
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
artemisgit.dev
ArtemisGIT: WhAAAAT!
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
intnetcode.com
IntNetCode: Repo
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
pitech-dev.com
PItech
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
bibitems.info
Forgejo: Git with a cup of tea
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
bibliobase.org
Forgejo: Git with a cup of tea
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
interlib.io
Forgejo: Git with a cup of tea
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
bluflohq.com
BluFlo | Tools for aviation and beyond
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
bluflosolutions.com
BluFlo | Tools for aviation and beyond
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
blueforgetechnology.com
Blue Forge Technology Solutions
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
albertacodingcompany.com
Alberta Coding Company Inc.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.