Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to measurepub.com

Measure Publishing · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
gurucoolpublishing.com
Gurucool Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
7thangelpublishing.com
7th Angel Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
socopublishing.com
SoCo Publishing, LLC
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
bluerupert.com
Blue Rupert Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
robeth.com
Robeth Publishing, LLC
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
8magpies.com
Eight Magpies Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
gunlapbook.com
Gun Lap - B&H Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
7firespublishing.com
Home | 7 Fires Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
agelesswisdompublishing.com
Ageless Wisdom Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
bickeringowls.com
Bickering Owls Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
ireckonpublishing.com
Home - ireckon Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
ireckonbooks.com
Home - ireckon Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
ireckonbook.com
Home - ireckon Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
4cpublishing.com
4C Publishing - 1553773860
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
dmjammes.com
Lavender & Moonstone Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
pioneerpublishinggroup.com
Store - Pioneer Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
ajcharlesonpublishing.com
AJ Charleson Publishing LLC
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
blueworldpublishing.com
Home - Blue World Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.