Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mdhatmaker.com

Michael D Hatmaker · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
mawelborn.com
Michael Welborn
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
ronimichaeli.com
Roni Michaeli
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
arraymaker.com
Array Maker
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
arthurnone.com
Peifeng Wang — Full-Stack Engineer, Tokyo
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
arieldon.com
Ariel Don
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
adambaker.org
Adam Baker
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
benoto.net
sudo make ./
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
adambarnhard.com
adam barnhard
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
nextmaker.com
Coding and STEM Projects for Kids at Home - NextMaker Box
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
armannvg.com
armannvg
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
arrayhelper.com
Text List to Array Converter – Fast, Versatile, and SQL-Compatible
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
fatmakahveci.com
Fatma Kahveci
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
interview6.com
Interview6 - JavaScript & ES6 Interview Guide
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
softethics.com
SoftEthics Technologies
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
andrewfavia.dev
Andrew Favia | Andrea Favia
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
annardunster.com
Anna R. Dunster
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
benjaminpatch.com
Benjamin Patch
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
aanyasinha.com
Aanya Sinha - Computer Science Student | Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.