similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to mdclarke.com

MD Clarke | Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

bobskaleski.com

Bob Skaleski | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Robert Kelly | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Home | Author D.M. Whitaker

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

billkauffman.net

Bill Kauffman | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

familyenterprise2307.com

Peter Vaughan | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

robert-lautner.com

robertlautner | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

robertjokeefe.com

Robert J. O’Keefe | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

theresajames-author.com

Theresa James | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

cameldoc.co.uk 🇬🇧

Carolyn Ellis | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

gregoryfunaro.com

Gregory Funaro | author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

mcdonoughauthor.com

Bill McDonough | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

robertaharold.com

Roberta Harold | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

arleneabundis.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

The Wyllie Girl | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

maureensafford.com

Maureen Safford | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

arinabauthor.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

kristelleangelli.com

| Kristelle Angelli | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.