similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to mcwrite50.com

Mcwrite50 alternatives & similar sites

david mcgrath consulting – writer, editor, gov't relations consultant — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Freelance Writing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
stacylu.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Stacy Lu – Writer, Editor & Editorial Consultant	en	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katherinegougeon.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	KATHERINE GOUGEON – Writer & Communications Consultant	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
debrabresnan.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Debra Bresnan – • Writer • Editor • Communications Consultant	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
faithfisher.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Faith Fisher – Writing Consultant and Editor	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kathypierre.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Kathy Pierre – Writer, Editor, Communications Strategist	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meacomms.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	MEA Communications – writing \| editing \| consulting	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annekopas.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Anne Kopas – Writer, Editor, Marketer	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reneewrotethis.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Renee Wrote This – Writer, editor, speaker	en	freelance-writing WordPress Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katiemachen.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Katie Machen – Writer, Editor, Cheesemonger	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielledirecto.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Danielle Directo-Meston - LA-Based Freelance Writer, Editor, Consultant	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
staceybutterfield.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Stacey Butterfield – Writer, Editor, Activist	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daniellebodnarwrites.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	danielle bodnar writes – Writer, Editor, Teacher	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elainegantzwright.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Elaine Gantz Wright – Writer & Consultant	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hebatallah.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Hebatallah – content writer, editor, writing and editing services	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vivekmjacob.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	VIVEK JACOB – Freelance writer, editor	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keevacommunications.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Keeva Communications – writing, editing, content creation, public relations	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cragganconsulting.co.uk ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Craggan Consulting – Technical Writing Services	United Kingdom en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielobailey.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Daniel O' Bailey — Writer, Editor & Communications Producer	en	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.