Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mcrombie.com

Michael Crombie · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
mattiacci.com
Michael Mattiacci
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
therealphatmike.com
T Michael Smith
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
newcomb1.com
Michael Newcomb
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
angstygaijin.com
Michael Migliacio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
mbarsinai.com
Michael's Corner
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
mbayucot.com
Michael Bayucot | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
thequantumwell.com
The Quantum Well
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
beyond-syntax.com
Beyond Syntax | Michael J. Schultz
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
themichaelbeale.com
Michael Beale | Developing Caveman
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
rjbofficial.com
RJBOfficial - Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
aaronprice.org
Aaron Michael Price | Blog and Product Updates
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
kriscarta.com
Kris Carta
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
benletchford.com
Ben Letchford
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
arsdehnel.com
Adam Dehnel
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
felixcreations.com
Michael Felix · FELIXCREATIONS
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
therammuppalla.com
Ram Muppalla — Builder, Technologist, Thinker
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
benfernandes.com
Ben Fernandes
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
gregstock.com
Greg Stock | Technology, Writing, and Projects
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.