Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mcnaveen.com

Naveen MC · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
matthiesen.dev
Adam Matthiesen
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
aidenmcdougal.dev
Aiden McDougal
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ahlgreen.net
Alexander Ahlgreen Madsen
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
maxbeizer.com
Max Beizer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
arikko.dev
Arik Chakma - Developer, creator.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
cmlohr.com
Colleen M Lohr - Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
gregularexpression.com
Gregular Expression
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
kylir.com
Home | Kylir Horton
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
benkugler.dev
Welcome - Ben's Build Logs
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
bobrains.com
The online home of Greg Chetcuti - greg.ca
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
djhigginz.com
The online home of Greg Chetcuti - greg.ca
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
domenighi.com
Dalton Domenighi | Developer & Entrepreneur
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
gregdotca.com
The online home of Greg Chetcuti - greg.ca
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
gregdot.com
The online home of Greg Chetcuti - greg.ca
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
laaxo.com
TLXO Creative Services
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
neueux.com
Screen Gallery | Neueux
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
nicholashagans.com
Nicholas Hagans
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
acmhackathon.com
Africa Creative Market Hackathon
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.