Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mckelt.com

Chris McKelt | Profile · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
matlabs.com
Mathew Profile
2 shared topicscloud-computing
68match
cmondor.com
Chris Mondor
2 shared topicscloud-computing
67match
maxoutis.com
Chris Maxoutis
2 shared topicscloud-computing
67match
neverlight.com
Neverlight LLC
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
cnatsis.com
Christos Natsis | Technology Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
media-glasses.co.uk 🇬🇧
Russ McKendrick
2 shared topicscloud-computing
65match
adilcan.me
Adil Can — Sr. Solutions Architect | Cloud Engineer
2 shared topicscloud-computing
64match
robrotheram.com
Tinkers.space
2 shared topicscloud-computing
64match
krissemmy.com
Emmanuel Christopher
2 shared topicscloud-computing
64match
adamscottspiker.org
Adam S. Spiker
2 shared topicscloud-computing
64match
cloudsembly.com
Cloudsembly
2 shared topicscloud-computing
64match
kubebuddy.com
Overview | Kube Buddy
2 shared topicscloud-computing
63match
gregth.com
Grigoris Thanasoulas
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
kulikalov.com
Anton Kulikalov
2 shared topicscloud-computing
63match
cloudenginelabs.io
CloudEngine Labs - Process-first DevSecOps & AI Accelerators
2 shared topicscloud-computing
63match
ahmedbebars.io
Ahmed Bebars | AWS Container Hero | Principal Engineer & Cloud Native Ambassador
2 shared topicscloud-computing
63match
arminreiter.com
arminreiter.com - Azure & Blockchain enthusiast, Software Engineering & Architecture, Scrum, DevOps, C#, .net core, ...
2 shared topicscloud-computing
63match
mayfield.io
Jimmy Mayfield | Platform Engineering & DevOps
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.