Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mcisted.com

Max McIsted · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
ishantandel.com
Ishan Tandel | Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
pixorah.com
Pixorah Design | AI-Assisted Creative Studio
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
ishmaelmccalla.com
Ishmael McCalla. AI-native product designer and builder.
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
akshat.me
Akshat Mishra | Design Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
argenisalvarez.com
Argenis Alvarez — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
arnoldpetersen.com
Arnold Petersen
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
brendabooth.com
Brenda Booth
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
arnonfriedman.com
Arnon Friedman | Product Designer | UX | AI
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
interactiondesignstudio.com
Interaction Design Studio | HCI, UX and AI assisted work
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
ixdstudio.com
Interaction Design Studio | HCI, UX and AI assisted work
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
ixdstudio.co.uk 🇬🇧
Interaction Design Studio | HCI, UX and AI assisted work
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
acsahstanley.com
Acsah Stanley | Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
mauriciowolff.com
Mauricio Wolff - AI Product Designer - @bitbonsai
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
maynara.com
May Fanucci — Staff Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
brettchien.com
Brett Chien · Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
ditto-ox.com
ditto | Our design always begins with empathy
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
robynalley.com
Robyn Alley
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
roksanapaluch.com
Roksana Paluch — Product System Designer
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.