Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mcellister.com

McEllister Lane · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
grimoary.com
Register
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
fayelane.com
Faye Lane
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
rooster-books.com
rooster books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
bedtimeblessingsbooks.com
Bedtime Blessings Series | Glenys Nellist
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
masterebook.com
Master Ebook
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
cameldoc.co.uk 🇬🇧
Carolyn Ellis | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
accentaccent.com
Accent Sisters
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
themasterbookkeeper.com
The Master Bookkeeper
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
alexanderlawrenceames.com
ALEXANDER LAWRENCE AMES - Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
kristiedean.com
Kristie Dean – Author of The World of Richard III
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
aleistercrowley.org
Aleister Crowley's Home Page
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
djbelliveau.com
DJBelliveau
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
theloars.com
Brave New World
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
cloisteredvandal.com
The Cloistered Vandal
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
thenewregister.com
The New Register
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
djvu-editions.com
DjVu Editions
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
intellectualfondue.com
Intellectual Fondue – Dip your mind in the world
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
soltlane.com
Soltlane
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.