Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mcassiano.com

Matheus Cassiano Candido · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
matheuspimenta.com
Matheus Pimenta, Software Engineer.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
matgomes.com
Matheus Gomes - Computers, Coding and Caffeine
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
andrezsanchez.com
Software, mathematics, language, and more.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
md2perpe.com
Per Persson (md2perpe) | Programming, mathematics and other
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
codecandies.com
code candies – funny source code comments
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
mathpiper.com
mathpiper
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
mathzetta.com
Mathzetta
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
mathdotnet.com
Math.NET
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
mathcoder.app
MathCoder
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
mathtocode.com
Math to Code
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
nicobombace.com
Programming and Maths
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
nicolasserranogarcia.com
Nicolás Serrano García
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
2timv.com
2timv, pythagorean, summation, mathematics
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
massimodipierro.com
Massimo Di Pierro
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
codecascades.com
Code Cascades
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
codermath.com
Home | Codermath
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
coderassists.com
Coder Assists -
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
gukov.dev
gukov.dev | Software egineering and math.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.