Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mbuege.com

Matthias Büge · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
matse.dev
hi I'm Matthias :)
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
74match
matthiashager.com
Matthias Hager
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
matthiaszarzecki.com
Matthias Zarzecki | iOS Development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
mathiashove.com
Mathias Hove
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
docodethatmatters.com
Do Code That Matters
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
greyblake.com
Posts | Serhii Potapov (greyblake)
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
pixcoders.com
Rafal Spacjer blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
kylejeske.com
Bit by Bit | A blog about coding, technology, and software development.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
gtcameron.com
Cameron Codes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andrewemerson.io
Andrew Emerson
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
kristiankahkonen.com
Kristian Kähkönen
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
matthxu.com
Matthew Xu
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
matsmi.com
Matthew Smith
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
matt-barry.com
Matt Barry
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
3bbas.dev
Ahmed Abbas - Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
alparslan.me
alparslan
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
matecdev.com
MatecDev | Mathematics, Technology, and Software Development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
cloudcodeblock.com
- Blog based on software development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.